New Parandrinae from Solomon Islands

Melanesiandra barclayi Santos-Silva Melanesiandra barclayi Santos-Silva

New species of Melzerella from Santa Cruz Bolivia

Melzerella monnei Wappes & Lingafelter 2011 Zootaxa 2805 Melzerella monnei Wappes & Lingafelter 2011 Zootaxa 2805

Two new species of Stenandra from Asia

Stenandra saitoae Komiya & Santos-Silva 2011 Zookeys 103 Stenandra saitoae Komiya & Santos-Silva 2011 Zookeys 103

CT-Logo for your web page:

The world largest beetles

Among the world's largest beetles, Titanus giganteus and Megasoma actaeon are the candidates for the heaviest beetles (Williams 2001), and a male specimen of Titanus giganteus is considered the longest beetle of the world (Williams 2001). However, the dry weight measurements of museum specimens provided in previous studies could considered unprecise (please  see end of this chapter). The total body length appears to be a more reliable value in comparisons than the body weight.

Titanus giganteus Titanus giganteus

Problems in length measurements outlined by Williams (2001) could be adjusted in dried collection specimens by resofting and applying a standard measurement procedure. For the longest beetle, Williams (2001) cites a specimen Titanus giganteus having 167mm. Two other candidates for the longest beetles are Macrodontia cervicornis and Dynastes hercules.

The longest beetle I have seen so far was a male of M.cervicornis having 169mm, which is actually in the collection of J. Sticher (Germany). This specimen was not mounted in an unnaturally stretched position and was measured with a digital caliper between the most outer mandibular and elytral tip.

Macrodontia cervicornis Macrodontia cervicornis

When we take thoracic horns into consideration in length measure- ments, Dynastes hercules may be as well a candidate for the longest beetle. Such species may reach a body length of 170mm, however, there is no confirmed record in literature.

Other noteworthy species with exaggerated morphologies is Batocera wallacei with impressive long antennae (max. length incl. antennae 315 mm, Raymond Chin, pers. comm.), Euchirus longimanus and Acrocinus longimanus with extraordinarily prolonged forelegs.

Dynastes hercules Dynastes hercules

In many if not all species the exaggerated morphologies (such as prolonged mandibles, horns, antennae and legs) could be found in males only, which use these structures in intra-specific fights. Exaggerated morphology is dependend on larval condition, but it is also the result of a certain genetical endowment inherited from large ancestors.

Fighting Dynastes hercules Fighting Dynastes hercules

Larger males have larger weapons in respect to their body length and win more often in direct encounters. A smaller male loosing in competition is not able to contribute genetic information to the populations gene pool, unless it develops a alternative reproductive tactic. Such „sneaking tactic“ may be the reason why we still encounter distinct small male caste in species with prolonged morphological structures. In Lucanidae, taxonomists distinguish between meso- (small), amphi- (medium) and telodont (large) male forms, in Dynastidae minor and mayor male forms.

Mayor and minor male of Goliathus goliatus Mayor and minor male of Goliathus goliatus

The general lack of large males with large weapons in some species indicate a lack of male competition. Among scarab beetles, the Rutelinae have bigger females, while in many flower-, rhino- and dung beetles big males with prolonged horns could be observed. In Buprestidae, females generally appear to be bigger than males. These groups seem to invest more biomass in reproductive output.

Individuals with exaggerated morphologies may also have advantages in inter-specific encounters, they may discourage possible predators and are not easy to ingest. This might be the explanation why except for a few almost all extraordinarily large species are relatively drab-colored and e.g. dont have (need) warning colors.      

Batocera wallacei Batocera wallacei

Remark. The treatment of dried museum specimens is often unknown, bacterial degradation and impact by parasites may result in a considerable variability of the dry weight. To compare weight measurements, a standard procedure should be applied on fresh speci- mens. In many studies freeze-drying is considered a good method to determine dry weight. A established dry weight/length relationship of a statistically significant number of specimens takes allometric relationships into account and allows the extrapolation of the dry weight based on length measurements of museum specimens.